Tax controversies come in many varieties, from audits to administrative appeals, from trial court to appellate court, from pre-tax disputes to post-tax refund claims. Whether involving federal or state tax, income, gift, excise, sales or property tax, we have the experience and depth to handle your tax controversy with unparalleled effectiveness. We represent individuals and business entities in all types of tax controversies with state, local, federal, and foreign governments. We have thorough experience in all facets of tax controversies and litigation, enabling us to offer pragmatic solutions to tax problems. While we believe the best way to resolve tax controversies is to avoid them, we recognize that isn't always possible.
For example, we have significant advocacy experience in administrative proceedings before the IRS, including at the District, Appeals, and National Office levels. We are prepared to litigate any tax matter before every possible tax venue, including the United States Tax Court, United States District Courts, United States Courts of Appeal, Court of Federal Claims and the Supreme Court. Our litigation team has an exceptional track record and has achieved landmark victories in tax matters against the IRS, the United States Department of Justice, and the California Franchise Tax Board. Robert Wood has over thirty years of experience with tax cases before various taxing authorities, even including appellate tax litigation.
We represent clients at every administrative level, in a varied mix of state, federal and foreign judicial forums, and in an extremely wide range of disputes with taxing authorities. We draw on our depth of experience to tailor each representation to meet our clients objectives. We regularly represent clients through the audit process, in fast-track (and standard) Appeals procedures, before the Appeals Division of the IRS, and in trial and appellate litigation. We look to achieve unsurpassed results at all levels of tax practice, from examination to collection.
Representations include:
Obtained a favorable settlement for an auto dealer and its owners in a multi-tiered IRS income tax audit and Tax Court case involving domestic and foreign entities, a bankruptcy, etc., which had consumed nearly three years before we were engaged as new counsel.
-
Represented the taxpayer in the appeal in Pennsylvania of Peaco v. Commissioner, 48 F. App'x 423, 90 A.F.T.R. 2d 2002-6813, 2002 USTC P 50,707 (3d Cir. Decided 9-27-02).
Won by unanimous decision of the five-member California Board of Equalization an $800,000 California franchise tax dispute involving a law firm's recognition of income on contingent fee personal injury litigation (Appeal of Gwilliam, Ivary, Chiosso, Cavalli & Brewer, Case No. 118821 (California State Board of Equalization, 11-12-02)).
Advised 175 women about tax alternatives concerning settlements of over $500,000 each in a nationally-publicized class action against the federal government, after 25 years of litigation in the federal and United States Supreme Courts.
References available on request.
|
|