The following article is adapted and reprinted from the M&A Tax Report, Vol. 10, No. 1, August 2001, Panel Publishers, New York, NY.
POOLING DEAD NOW
By Robert W. Wood M&A Tax Report readers have had warning for quite some time that
pooling of interest accounting was being nixed by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB). See Wood, "Pooling Perambulations: Lock-Up Options
and Termination Fees," Vol. 8, No. 6, The M&A Tax Report (January 2000),
p. 1; Wood, "Pooling of Interests Accounting to be Ousted," Vol. 7, No.
11, The M&A Tax Report (June 1999), p. 1; and Wood, "Pooling: One More
Word," Vol. 7, No. 12, The M&A Tax Report (July 1999), p. 7. As expected, the FASB has unanimously voted to enact new standards,
eliminating the pooling of interest treatment. Pooling allowed merging
companies to combine assets without recording any goodwill. As a result,
pooling became awfully popular, especially during the go-go years (which
regrettably left us over a year ago now!). Pooling was extremely popular
precisely because the alternative required companies to write down the
value of goodwill assets. This so-called "purchase" accounting was considered
anathema by most companies and professionals when the FASB first started
dabbling with the idea of eliminating pooling. Although there was a great hue and cry about eliminating pooling,
that opposition was hushed considerably, when last year the proposal was
made to eliminate goodwill amortization. Companies will now be allowed
to leave goodwill assets on their books until they determine those asset
values have become impaired. At the point of impairment, the companies
will be required to take write-downs to reduce goodwill assets to their
fair value. It's Too Late Baby...
If pooling was on your list of things to do, it is too late now.
June 30, 2001 was the last day companies could enter into pooling transactions.
For companies with calendar years, the new goodwill rules will take effect
January 1, 2002. Some companies will be allowed to adopt the new goodwill
rules earlier at their discretion. Such early adoption is allowed for companies
with fiscal years beginning after March 15, 2001, as long as the company
has not yet issued their fiscal first quarter financial statements. See
"FASB Enacts Standards Prohibiting 'Pooling' in Mergers," Wall Street
Journal, July 6, 2001, p. C16. Reprieve or Reprise?
As recently as a few weeks ago it was expected that the June 30,
2001 deadline might be the subject of a reprieve (until July 31 or so).
See Michaels, "New Rules May Be Delayed For Merger Deals," Financial Times,
May 16, 2001, p. 5. However, the FASB did not decide to give beleaguered
investment bankers a break. And after all, the June 30, effective date
had been expected for a long, long time. As it happened, the FASB met on May 16, 2001 to deal with three different
issues — asset and disposal, goodwill, and qualifying special-purpose entities
— brought up in three different exposure drafts. The FASB reconsidered
asset disposal issues, plus resumed discussion of the exposure draft, "Business
Combinations and Intangible Assets' Accounting for Goodwill." It also reconsidered
the FASB staff's proposed guidance on servicing activities of qualifying
special-purpose entities (QSPEs). Asset and Disposal Issues
The FASB examined the recognition and measurement provisions for
impairment of assets to be held and used. Both recoverability cash-flow
estimates and fair-value measurements were used. In addition, the board
answered several questions on the recognition and measurement provisions
of the exposure draft. One question was whether to retain the recognition (the undiscounted
cash-flow recoverability test) and measurement (fair value) provisions
for the impairment of assets to be held and used. The FASB reaffirmed by
a vote of five to one the exposure draft's position. The board also reaffirmed
three points on the recoverability of cash flow that were part of the exposure
draft. Cash Flow Flap
The board engaged in considerable discussion on the recoverability
of cash flows. It eventually settled on a hybrid answer. On the fair value
measurements, the FASB dealt with four items, approving one (B) as it appeared
in the exposure draft. But on item (A), the board decided to eliminate
references to valuation techniques other than present value (that is, option
pricing models, matrix pricing, option-adjusted spread models, and fundamental
analysis). On (C), the board retained the concept but requested that the FASB
staff change the location of the text. On (D), the board determined that
additional guidance for the estimation of future cash flow used to measure
fair value should be retained, but that those estimates should be applied
on a pretax basis. Goodwill — There's the Rub
There were several items on the FASB's agenda regarding the exposure
draft, "Business Combination and Intangible Assets' Accounting for Goodwill."
Among other topics, they included: fair value measurement; the order of
impairment tests; allocation guidance at transition; effective date for
goodwill and intangible assets statement; income statement display for
first impairment loss; effective date for elimination of pooling (Yikes!);
and effective date for the business combinations statement. The FASB agreed that significant clarification was needed. On impairment
tests, after considerable discussion, the FASB agreed that a test for long-lived
assets should precede the goodwill impairment test. This departs from the
position taken in the exposure draft. However, the FASB left intact the
exposure draft on allocation guidance at transition (so all goodwill should
be allocated to reporting units). Transition and Effective Dates
The FASB staff prepared a chart providing six alternative positions
as to which effective dates were appropriate. The fourth alternative was
chosen, providing for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, with
early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2001.
This effective date will apply to the board's tentative decisions on goodwill
as well as to its decisions on other acquired intangible assets, whether
purchased singly, in a group, or as part of a business combination. The board decided to shift its position in the exposure draft on
the subject of income statement display of a first impairment loss. An
impairment loss recognized in the year of adoption will be treated as a
change in accounting principle. It Is Finally Here (or Gone)!
A controversial decision within the business combinations project
was the elimination of pooling. Despite the earlier contention on this
issue, the FASB affirmed that pooling would be prohibited for combinations
initiated after June 30, 2001. The FASB also indicated that all other provisions,
including the adoption of the purchase method, and the recognition of identifiable
intangible assets separately from goodwill, would also become effective
after June 30, 2001. Pooling Dead Now, Vol. 10, No. 1, The M&A Tax Report (August
2001), p. 6.