The following article is adapted and reprinted from the M&A Tax Report, Vol. 10, No. 2, September 2001, Panel Publishers, New York, NY.
PREFERRED STOCK DISTRIBUTED IN RECAPITALIZATION HELD NOT TAXABLE
By Robert W. Wood Technical Advice Memorandum 200116002, Tax Analysts Doc. No. 2001-11252,
2001 TNT 78-21, considers shareholders who receive preferred stock in a
recapitalization. The question is whether the distribution of the preferred
is considered a taxable distribution under Section 305(b) or 305(c). The
Tech Advice Memo rules that a shareholder's receipt of preferred stock
in a recapitalization is not a taxable distribution under Sections 305(b)
or (c). Facts and Assumptions
Consider the following: Target, an S corporation, is owned by three
unrelated shareholders. Target's sole asset is a contract to provide a
fixed quantity of product to one customer. Publicly traded LossCo acquired
an 80 percent interest in Target for cash and a note after Target recapitalized,
created Newco, and merged with and into Newco under state law. Target common
then converted into Newco preferred. The Service reasoned that Section 305(b) is inapplicable because
the distribution did not increase the shareholder's proportionate interest
in Newco. The Service also determined that Section 305(c) was inapplicable
because the preferred stock participates in corporate growth to a significant
extent. Go Figure?
Ordinarily, of course, a corporate distribution of property to a
shareholder with respect to the corporation's stock is taxed under Section
301(c). Section 305(a) provides an exception to the taxation of distributions
to shareholders under Section 301(c): gross income does not include the
amount of any distribution of the stock of a corporation made by the corporation
to its shareholders with respect to its stock. Section 305(b) eliminates
the exclusion from gross income contained in Section 305(a) for distributions
of stock that meet the requirements of paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4) or
(5) of Section 305(b). Section 305(b)(1) applies to distributions payable,
at the election of any shareholders, either in stock or property. Section
305(b)(2) applies to disproportionate distributions in which the distribution
has the effect of the receipt of property by some shareholders and an increase
in the proportionate interests of other shareholders in the assets or earnings
and profits of the corporation. Section 305(b)(3) applies to the receipt
of preferred stock by some common shareholders and the receipt of common
stock by other common shareholders. Section 305(b)(4) applies to distributions
with respect to preferred stock. Section 305(b)(5) applies to a distribution
of convertible preferred stock that have the effect of distributions described
in section 305(b)(2). Of course, an actual distribution of stock is not always necessary
for a transaction to be taxed as a distribution of property under section
301. Section 305(c) can treat certain described circumstances as a deemed
distribution of stock. A change in conversion ratio, a change in redemption
price, a difference between redemption price and issue price (i.e., a redemption
premium), a redemption treated as a distribution to which section 301 applies,
or any other transaction (including a recapitalization) having a similar
effect on the interest of any shareholder is a "distribution" with respect
to a shareholder where the distribution has the result described in paragraph
(2), (3), (4) or (5) of Section 305(b). Such a distribution will only be deemed to be made with respect to
any shareholder whose proportionate interest in the earnings and profits
(or assets) of the corporation is increased by the change (difference,
redemption, or similar transaction). On the facts of the ruling, Shareholders A, B, and C owned 100 percent
of the outstanding stock of Newco. Then, they received (pro rata) 100 percent
of the Newco preferred stock, and their common stock interest was reduced
to 20 percent of the outstanding Newco common shares. Section 305(b)(2)
does not apply to Shareholder A, B, or C because they did not increase
their proportionate interest in the assets or earnings and profits of Newco
in the transaction, either as a class of shareholders or relative to each
other. Section 1.305-3(e) of the Regulations (Examples 1 and 2), demonstrate
that Section 305(b)(2) does not apply to a distribution of additional common
stock to a corporation's common shareholders and property to the corporation's
preferred shareholders. The reason is that the distribution does not increase
the common shareholders' proportionate interest (as a class), in the assets
or earnings and profits of the corporation. Section 305(c), Etc.
Sections 305(b)(1), (3), (4) and (5), for clear reasons, also did
not apply. Section 305(c) reflects the notion that income from a financial
instrument payable on a deferred basis is generally better measured by
requiring the accrual of such income on an economic basis over the period
during which payment is deferred. H.R. Rep. No. 881, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess.
at 98 (1990). Congress expressed its intention to not limit the authority
of the Secretary and the IRS regarding the proper treatment of redemption
premiums on preferred stock. Thus, the Secretary may determine what constitutes
a redemption premium (or a disguised redemption premium). For example,
if at the time of the issuance of cumulative preferred stock there is no
intention for dividends to be paid currently, the IRS may treat such dividends
as a disguised redemption premium. H.R. Rep. No. 881, 101st Cong., 2nd
Sess. at 99 (1990). Fortunately, in a long and somewhat convoluted analysis, the Service
concluded that Section 305(c) did not apply. Preferred Stock Distributed in Recapitalization Held Not Taxable,
Vol. 10, No. 2, The M&A Tax Report (September 2001), p. 5.